Averting Showrooming’s Scrooge Effect
As the holiday season swings into gear so does competitive shopping, with consumers scoping out merchandise in physical stores and then comparison shopping for the lowest price on their mobile device, dubbed "showrooming." In an effort to combat or "embrace" this phenomenon, some retailers, led by Best Buy, have implemented strategies including price matching to convert more shoppers into buyers. Nobody is winning in this new game — not manufacturers, retailers or consumers.
While I applaud retailers recognition that mobile technology is here to stay and for building a strategy they can use to their advantage, they're embracing short-term solutions at best. Just as Ebenezer Scrooge clung to his tight-fisted and greedy ways before he was enlightened, retailers and manufacturers need to embrace new methodologies and practices to combat showrooming as price matching may have a negative impact on everyone in the purchase stream, not just the retailer.
What's the Scrooge factor for retailers? Sadly, retailers may find themselves matching prices with unauthorized, fly-by-night retailers that have a few units. While the rogue sellers have very little inventory, they can impact price matching generated by algorithmic price dropping, which results in margin pressure on everybody. As brick-and-mortars begin to match online retailers’ prices, they will have less money available to promote sales in their stores, maintain the requisite levels of employees needed for great customer service and will drop product lines that are no longer profitable.
Ebenezer has a "bah, humbug" effect on manufacturers as retailers responding to the ever-decreasing prices below minimum advertised prices or suggested retail prices often look to manufacturers for financial compensation. This compensation can come in the form of deductions from invoices being paid, demands for other discounts or other benefits to help subsidize the retailer's marketing decision to match the lower online price.